Guide · AI

AI + study workflows that save time

Use one shared AI thread per room to cut coordination work—without interrupting your focus blocks.

Open a room with Assist Share a Study With Me room Run a 25 / 5 then ask AI

Finding

6‑month RCT, 6,000 workers

A 2025 randomized field experiment found workers with integrated gen‑AI spent ~25% less time on email (about 3 hours/week) and completed documents faster, without increasing meetings.

Finding

Moderate but persistent gains

Intent‑to‑treat effects were ~1.4 hours/week saved even for people who only partly adopted the tool, showing value even with light use.

Finding

Quality held steady

The study observed no drop in performance metrics, suggesting time saved on coordination can move into deep work.

Room patterns

Keep AI organized, not chaotic

Single shared Assist thread

Keep one AI thread per room so context stays tight; pin the thread link in chat.

Focus-first, then ask

Run the timer first; use the first 5 minutes of the break to ask AI for summaries or starter code.

Template prompts

Use prompts like “Explain this proof in 3 steps” or “Draft a study outline for Chapter 5” and paste back condensed actions.

Guardrails

Avoid pasting full assignments; summarize requirements instead.
Cite sources when AI drafts text; keep quotes under 25 words.
Use versioned docs so group edits are reviewable.

FAQ

Does AI replace the study group?

No. The field experiment showed efficiency gains on email/docs but no change in meetings. Use AI to reduce coordination, not to skip collaboration.

When should we ask AI during a block?

During planning or early in a break to avoid derailing the focus window. Keep the main sprint for execution.

How do we keep answers consistent?

Pin one shared thread per room, reuse it across sessions, and capture key answers in chat so everyone sees the same guidance.